The E-learning Curve at Edublogs

As discussed in a previous post, to assist in understanding the “parallel criteria” (1989, p.233) relationship between these test of rigour and the scientific terms for validity, Guba and Lincoln provide the following table (1981, p.104):
Table 1 Relationship between parallel criteria
Aspect
Scientific Term
Naturalistic Term
Truth Value
Internal Validity
Credibility
Applicability
External Validity
Fittingness/transferability
Consistency
Reliability
Dependability/auditability
Neutrality
Objectivity
Confirmability
When considering appropriate research designs to evaluate the effectiveness of [...]

[Read more]

Well now. Back from NY and totally energised by my trip to Manhattan. Where were we…? Oh yes -
The methodology I’ll be describing is a generalised account of the type work I carry out when developing and implementing non-formal learning initiatives in organisations - I invite you to argue, discuss, praise etc. as [...]

[Read more]

Well now. Back from NY and totally energised by my trip to Manhattan. Where were we…? Oh yes -
The methodology I’ll be describing is a generalised account of the type work I carry out when developing and implementing non-formal learning initiatives in organisations - I invite you to argue, discuss, praise etc. as [...]

[Read more]

Well now. Back from NY and totally energised by my trip to Manhattan. Where were we…? Oh yes -
The methodology I’ll be describing is a generalised account of the type work I carry out when developing and implementing non-formal learning initiatives in organisations - I invite you to argue, discuss, praise etc. as [...]

[Read more]

I’m going to begin this post by mentioning Donald Clark’s view on Donald Kirkpatrick’s model - the post has the tongue-in-cheek title Donald Talks Bollocks, and it gives an alternative view on the four levels; have a read, it’s good stuff.
However, as Mr. Clark points out, rejecting Kirkpatrick doesn’t provide a answer to how [...]

[Read more]

I’m going to begin this post by mentioning Donald Clark’s view on Donald Kirkpatrick’s model - the post has the tongue-in-cheek title Donald Talks Bollocks, and it gives an alternative view on the four levels; have a read, it’s good stuff.
However, as Mr. Clark points out, rejecting Kirkpatrick doesn’t provide a answer to how [...]

[Read more]

I’m going to begin this post by mentioning Donald Clark’s view on Donald Kirkpatrick’s model - the post has the tongue-in-cheek title Donald Talks Bollocks, and it gives an alternative view on the four levels; have a read, it’s good stuff.
However, as Mr. Clark points out, rejecting Kirkpatrick doesn’t provide a answer to how [...]

[Read more]

Donald L Kirkpatrick first published his ideas on evaluating learning in 1959 in a series of articles in the US Training and Development Journal. The articles were subsequently included in his book Evaluating Training Programs (originally published in 1975; I have the 2006 edition).
In this text he outlined and further developed his theories on evaluating [...]

[Read more]

Donald L Kirkpatrick first published his ideas on evaluating learning in 1959 in a series of articles in the US Training and Development Journal. The articles were subsequently included in his book Evaluating Training Programs (originally published in 1975; I have the 2006 edition).
In this text he outlined and further developed his theories on evaluating [...]

[Read more]

Donald L Kirkpatrick first published his ideas on evaluating learning in 1959 in a series of articles in the US Training and Development Journal. The articles were subsequently included in his book Evaluating Training Programs (originally published in 1975; I have the 2006 edition).
In this text he outlined and further developed his theories on evaluating [...]

[Read more]